Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The causal relation between research and economic growth is of particular importance for political support of science and technology as well as for academic purposes. This article revisits the causal relationship between research articles published and economic growth in O rganisation for E conomic C o‐operation and Development ( OECD ) countries for the period 1981–2011, using bootstrap panel causality analysis, which accounts for cross‐section dependency and heterogeneity across countries. The article, by the use of the specific method and the choice of the country group, makes a contribution to the existing literature. Our empirical results support unidirectional causality running from research output (in terms of total number of articles published) to economic growth for the US , F inland, H ungary, and M exico; the opposite causality from economic growth to research articles published for C anada, F rance, I taly, N ew Z ealand, the UK , A ustria, I srael, and P oland; and no causality for the rest of the countries. Our findings provide important policy implications for research policies and strategies for OECD countries.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ntuli et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: