This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
This article examines current developments in genocide studies, focusing specifically on three main areas of conflict and debate between different perspectives: the question of how to define genocide, causal models and comparative studies, and prevention. Further, this article presents an analysis of Eurocentrism in the field, arguing that genocide studies needs a broader scope to include new and unique perspectives from all areas of the world. What is needed, in fact, is genuine intercultural dialogue, which can transform the field of genocide studies into a broad, culturally diverse field.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Daniel Feierstein (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: