Why the study?
Do small-sided games elicit different heart rate responses compared to official match-play in young soccer players?
Do small-sided games elicit different heart rate responses compared to official match-play in young soccer players?
Smaller-sided soccer games (3- to 5-a-side) elicit higher heart rate responses comparable to or exceeding official match-play, providing sufficient high-intensity training.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Smaller SSGs elicit higher HR than matches in youth soccer; leaves open optimal formats for match-specific conditioning.
Small sided games (SSGs) are a match specific type of training. In addition, there is an insufficient number of studies that compare heart rate (HR) responses of SSGs and official match-play (OM). The purpose of this study was to investigate the heart rate responses during SSGs and OM in young soccer players. Twenty-two male soccer players (mean ± SD; age 17.4 ± 0.9 years, height 174.9 ± 6.6 cm, body weight 67.7 ± 8.1 kg) volunteered to participate in this study. The first session included anthropometric measurements and a maximum running test (RT). Following the RT session, all players participated in five different randomly ordered SSG sessions (3-, 4-, 5-, 7- and 9-a-side with goalkeepers). OMs were also monitored in the fourth week of the study. A one-way multivariate repeated-measures analysis of variance (MANOVA) was then conducted to evaluate the differences between the SSGs and OM. The results showed that 3-a-side elicited significantly higher HR and %HRmax than other SSGs and OM, whereas 9-a-side resulted in significantly lower HR and %HRmax compared to other SSG formats and OM (p < 0.05). In conclusion, 3-a-side, 4-a-side and 5-a-side SSG formats provide players with the opportunity to spend sufficient proportion of time spent in high intensity zones that are specific to match demands.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alper Aşçı (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: