Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We address the notion of corporate coherence recently made prominent by Teece et al. (1994. Understanding corporate coherence: theory and evidence. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 23 : 1–30). We argue that the literature is confused on the meaning of this notion (and similar notions) along a number of dimensions. Drawing on insights from market‐process theories, we propose a dynamic understanding of corporate coherence, an understanding that involves the corporate capacity to strike a favorable balance between the production and exploitation of new knowledge. This argument is elaborated drawing on Austrian economics, evolutionary economics, and post‐Marshallian economics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Foss et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: