Why the study?
The study was conducted to examine the association between water hardness, arterial stiffness, and carotid atheromatic burden.
Does consumption of water with hardness ≥250 mg/dL increase carotid atherosclerotic burden and arterial stiffness in adults aged 40-99 years?
Does consumption of water with hardness ≥250 mg/dL increase carotid atherosclerotic burden and arterial stiffness in adults aged 40-99 years?
Consumption of extra hard water (≥250 mg/dL) is associated with increased carotid atherosclerotic burden, particularly in older adults.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Hard water intake should not yet influence clinical recommendations; leaves open its potential contribution to carotid atherosclerosis.
Introduction It has been long investigated the potential role of water quality in cardiovascular health. Purpose The aim of this study was to examine the association between water hardness, arterial stiffness and atheromatic burden in carotid arteries. Design and methods Corinthia study is a cross-sectional epidemiological study conducted in subjects aged 40–99 years. Intima media thickness (IMT) was measured in the left and right common carotid artery, carotid bulb and internal carotid artery. The average of the measurements (mean IMT) and the maximum IMT were determined as the representative value of carotid atherosclerosis burden. Pulse wave velocity (PWV) was used to evaluate arterial stiffness. Tap-water samples were collected from the study area, and analyzed for major, minor and trace elements, as well as pH and total hardness. Results In this analysis we included data from 1.404 participants. In subjects consuming water with a hardness above 250mg/dL, especially in those above >65 years old maximum and mean IMT was significantly increased compared to those consuming water with a hardness above 250mg/dL (1.61mm vs. 1.34mm respectively, p<0.001 and 1.15mm vs. 1.05, p=0.005 for WH ≥250mg/dL and WH <250mg/dL, respectively). Similarly, the prevalence of atheromatic plaques was higher in subjects of the first category (15,2% vs. 7,6%, p=0.004). No differences emerged for the arterial stiffness in the individual subgroups. statistically significant correlation was revealed (p=0.004). Conclusions There seem to be a negative association between extra hard water and carotid atheromatic burden highlighting the possible impact of water quality in cardiovascular health.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vogiatzi et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: