Why the study?
Autonomic nervous system dysfunction contributes to arrhythmogenesis in end-stage kidney disease, but heart rate variability differences between hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients were unclear.
Does dialysis modality (hemodialysis vs peritoneal dialysis) affect heart rate variability at rest and in response to stress in patients with end-stage kidney disease?
Does dialysis modality (hemodialysis vs peritoneal dialysis) affect heart rate variability at rest and in response to stress in patients with end-stage kidney disease?
Autonomic nervous system dysfunction, as measured by heart rate variability, is not largely affected by dialysis modality, though hemodialysis patients may have slightly more impaired recovery following physical stress.
No difference in HRV between HD and PD; leaves open whether dialysis modality influences autonomic dysfunction or arrhythmia risk in ESKD.
Cardiac arrhythmias and sudden death are the leading causes of mortality in end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). Autonomic nervous system (ANS) dysfunction contributes to this arrhythmogenic background. This study compared heart rate variability (HRV) indices between hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients, both at rest and in response to mental and physical stimulation maneuvers. Thirty-four HD and 34 PD patients matched for age, sex, and dialysis vintage, and 17 age- and sex-matched controls were studied. ANS function was examined by linear and non-linear HRV indices. Heart rate was recorded continuously (Finometer-PRO) at rest and during ANS maneuvers (orthostatic, mental-arithmetic, sit-to-stand, handgrip exercise tests). At rest, no significant differences between HD and PD were observed in HRV (root mean square of successive differences [RMSSD]: HD = 57.1 ± 81.1 vs PD = 69.6 ± 113.4 ms; P = 0.792), except for detrended fluctuation analysis (DFA-α1) (HD = 0.87 ± 0.40 vs PD = 0.70 ± 0.20; P = 0.047). DFA-α1 was significantly lower in PD than controls (1.00 ± 0.33; P < 0.05). All HRV indices during the mental-arithmetic test (RMSSD: HD = 128.2 ± 346.0 vs PD = 87.5 ± 150.0 ms; P = 0.893) and the physical stress tests were similar between HD and PD. The standard deviation along the line-of-identity (SD2)/the standard deviation perpendicular to the line-of-identity (SD1) ratio during mental-arithmetic was marginally lower in HD and significantly lower in PD than controls (PD = 1.31 ± 0.47 vs controls = 1.79 ± 0.64; P < 0.05). Both dialysis groups presented similar patterns in HRV responses during orthostatic and handgrip exercise tests. After the sit-to-stand, RMSSD, SD1, SD2, and DFA-α2 were higher compared to rest only in HD (RMSSD = 57.1 ± 81.1 vs 126.7 ± 185.7 ms; P = 0.028), suggesting a greater difficulty of HD patients in recovering normal ANS function in response to physical stress. In conclusion, HRV indices at rest and after mental and physical stimulation did not differ between HD and PD; however, the ANS responses following the sit-to-stand test were more impaired in HD. These findings suggest that ANS dysfunction is not largely affected by dialysis modality, but small differences in normal ANS recovery may exist.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Faitatzidou et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: