What question did this study set out to answer?

To evaluate legal frameworks and preventive approaches governing juvenile involvement in violent extremism by analyzing international standards, domestic statutes, and comparative models.

February 15, 2026International Journal For Multidisciplinary ResearchOpen Access

Juvenile Engagement in Violent Extremism: Legal Responses and Preventive Strategies

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Authors

BNBaishali NayakBhagwant University KCKhuku ChoudhurySiksha O Anusandhan University ADAmruta DasSiksha O Anusandhan University

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Doctrinal legal analysis reveals significant gaps between counter-terrorism laws and child protection standards in juvenile extremism cases, highlighting the necessity of rights-based rehabilitation.

Key Points

To evaluate legal frameworks and preventive approaches governing juvenile involvement in violent extremism by analyzing international standards, domestic statutes, and comparative models.
Conducted a doctrinal analysis of international conventions (UNCRC, Beijing Rules, Riyadh Guidelines) and Indian legislation (Juvenile Justice Act, 2015; Unlawful Activities Prevention Act, 1967).
Performed a comparative review of counter-extremism, prevention, and reintegration policies across the United Kingdom, the United States, and the European Union.
Identified critical gaps, including ambiguous classifications of extremist conduct as heinous offenses, lack of child-specific counter-extremism policies, and institutional coordination deficits.
Showed that conventional counter-terrorism frameworks risk over-criminalization and stigmatization, whereas child-centric models prioritizing de-radicalization and social reintegration offer strategically superior and constitutionally aligned outcomes.

Cite This Study

Nayak et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a74447c354205da86092ebb https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2026.v08i01.68942

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Implication

Doctrinal legal analysis reveals significant gaps between counter-terrorism laws and child protection standards in juvenile extremism cases, highlighting the necessity of rights-based rehabilitation.

Juvenile Engagement in Violent Extremism: Legal Responses and Preventive Strategies

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Cite This Study

Juvenile Engagement in Violent Extremism: Legal Responses and Preventive Strategies

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Cite This Study

Also Consider

Also Consider