Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Objective: We sought to evaluate the effect of adding UMEC to FF/VI on asthma symptoms. Methods: analyses assessing the impact of baseline type 2 inflammation status on treatment response. Results: Least-squares mean (95% CI) reductions from baseline in E-RS: Asthma total score exceeded the minimum clinically important difference (-2.0 units) and were numerically greater with FF/UMEC 62.5/VI (-2.89 [-3.15 to -2.64]; n = 814) versus FF/VI (-2.47 [-2.73 to -2.22]; n = 813). The proportion of responders (45% [n = 360] vs 41% [n = 327]) and odds of response (odds ratio, 1.18 [95% CI, 0.96 to 1.45]) were numerically greater with FF/UMEC 62.5/VI versus FF/VI. Similar trends were observed irrespective of type 2 status. Conclusions: Patients with symptomatic asthma may benefit from optimized treatment interventions, such as adding a long-acting muscarinic antagonist to ICS/LABA.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pizzichini et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: