Why the study?
The newly developed hinotori surgical robot system has entered clinical use, but studies evaluating its use for robot-assisted radical nephrectomy and inferior vena cava tumor thrombectomy were lacking.
Is robot-assisted radical nephrectomy and inferior vena cava tumor thrombectomy using the hinotori system safe and feasible in patients with renal cell carcinoma and IVC tumor thrombus?
Is robot-assisted radical nephrectomy and inferior vena cava tumor thrombectomy using the hinotori system safe and feasible in patients with renal cell carcinoma and IVC tumor thrombus?
The novel hinotori surgical robot system appears feasible and safe for performing radical nephrectomy and IVC tumor thrombectomy in patients with renal cell carcinoma and level I-II IVC thrombus.
Supports feasibility of hinotori for RCC with level I-II IVC thrombus; leaves open need for prospective validation before wider use.
Introduction: A newly developed surgical robot system, hinotori, with various unique advantages has been in clinical use in Japan; however, there have not been any studies of robot-assisted radical nephrectomy and inferior vena cava tumor thrombectomy using hinotori. Case presentation: We describe two male patients aged 67 and 76 years old with right renal cell carcinoma and a level II and I inferior vena cava tumor thrombus, respectively, undergoing robot-assisted radical nephrectomy and inferior vena cava tumor thrombectomy using hinotori. Both operations were successfully completed with a purely robotic procedure without any major perioperative complications, resulting in the following findings: time using robotic system, 158 and 156 min; total operative time, 228 and 214 min; estimated blood loss, 535 and 200 mL, respectively. Conclusion: Based on our first experience, robot-assisted radical nephrectomy and inferior vena cava tumor thrombectomy using hinotori may be an effective treatment for renal cell carcinoma with inferior vena cava tumor thrombus ≤level II.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Motoyama et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: