Why the study?
Does perivascular microapplication of histamine and specific H1/H2 receptor agonists cause dilatation of pial veins and arterioles in anesthetized cats?
Does perivascular microapplication of histamine and specific H1/H2 receptor agonists cause dilatation of pial veins and arterioles in anesthetized cats?
Histamine H2 receptors predominantly mediate pial arteriolar dilatation, while pial veins show negligible venomotor activity to histamine, suggesting a sparse distribution of histamine receptors on their outer surfaces.
Pial arteriolar histamine responses in cats should not alter clinical practice; leaves open receptor mapping in human cerebral vessels.
H2-receptors predominantly mediate pial arteriolar dilatation in response to histamine, but the reaction of pial veins to histamine has not been clearly identified. In anesthetized cats, we examined responses of pial veins and arterioles to perivascular microapplication of histamine and specific histamine H1 and H2 receptor agonists. Arterioles were very sensitive to the H2-receptor agonist impromidine, with significant dilatation (+16%) occurring at concentrations as low as 10(-10) M. Arteriolar responses to H1 receptor stimulation by 2.2-pyridylethylamine were small, even at high concentrations. The order of potency and maximum dilatations found for the receptor agonists were: H2 (43%) greater than histamine (28%) greater than H1 (17%). By contrast, pial veins did not respond to histamine or the receptor agonists. The results indicate that pial venomotor activity to histamine is negligible, and suggest a sparse distribution of histamine receptors on the outer surfaces of pial veins.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gross et al. (1981) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: