Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study examines community resilience among displaced and non-displaced populations in the context of a prolonged war-related emergency. The primary objective was to compare levels of community resilience between these two groups and to explore whether the relationship between displacement status and community resilience changed over time. Data were collected using a repeated cross-sectional design at two time points: December 2023 (approximately two months after the onset of the war) and November 2024 (thirteen months into the conflict), from adults residing in a conflict-affected area in northern Israel. Each wave included a different sample drawn from the same population. As hypothesized, the findings indicate that community resilience was initially lower among individuals displaced from their homes compared to those who remained in place. However, this gap diminished over time, as the prolonged emergency conditions persisted. The study underscores the importance of context-sensitive and group-specific strategies for enhancing community resilience. By recognizing the distinct needs and trajectories of both displaced and non-displaced populations, policymakers and practitioners can develop more effective interventions to support communities in coping with collective trauma and rebuilding stronger, more cohesive social structures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maor et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: