Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
By exploiting the sources of opportunity not designed for radar applications, the passive radar system often operates with a P d in the range from 60 to 85% for acceptable false alarm rates. Multistatic radar networks can be used to both increase detection capability and localisation accuracy. The standard Cramér‐Rao lower bound (CRLB) cannot be used for a realistic assessment of the target localisation accuracy in a surveillance area since it provides optimistic predictions. In this study, the authors derive the CRLB with missing observations, namely for P d < 1, for the multisensory case. The results are illustrated for the case study of a multistatic passive radar exploiting FM radio transmissions where each bistatic pair within the network is assigned with a detection probability for each target position in the surveillance area. The obtained CRLB with P d < 1 is then employed to compare the localisation performance achievable by a multistatic passive radar when using different sets of measurements: (A) only range measurements, (B) range and Doppler frequency measurements and (C) Doppler frequency measurements only. The reported results show that the proposed CRLB with P d < 1 yields a more reliable prediction of the achievable performance thus allowing a fair comparison of the above different strategies for target localisation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Anastasio et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: