Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Rodlike gold(I) and gold(III) complexes [AuR(CN(C(6)H(4))(m)()OC(n)()H(2)(n)()(+1)-p)] (m = 1, n = 10, R = C(6)F(5); m = 2, n = 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, R = C(6)F(5), C(6)F(4)Br-o, C(6)F(4)Br-p), [(-4,4'-C(6)F(4)C(6)F(4)){AuCN(C(6)H(4))(m)()OC(n)()H(2)(n)()(+1)}(2)] (m = 1, 2; n = 4, 6, 8, 10, 12), [AuRI(2)(CNC(6)H(4)C(6)H(4)OC(n)()H(2)(n)()(+1)-p)] (R = C(6)F(5), n = 8; R = C(6)F(4)Br-o, n = 10), and [(-4,4'-C(6)F(4)C(6)F(4)){AuX(2)CN(C(6)H(4))(m)()OC(n)()H(2)(n)()(+1)}(2)] (m = 1, 2; n = 4, 6, 8, 10, 12) have been prepared and their liquid crystal behavior has been studied. The gold(III) compounds are not mesomorphic, but all the perhalo-gold(I) derivatives described are liquid crystals except the phenyl isocyanide gold(I) derivative [Au(C(6)F(5))(CNC(6)H(4)OC(10)H(21)-p)]. The mononuclear derivatives show only a nematic (N) phase when the isocyanides have a short tail (n = 4), N and smectic A phases (S(A)) when the isocyanides have an intermediate tail (n = 6, 8), and only S(A) phases for longer chains. Their thermal stability is high, even in the isotropic state. The variation in transition temperatures is as follows: C(6)F(4)Br-p >/= C(6)F(5) > C(6)F(4)Br-o when n </= 6 and C(6)F(4)Br-p > C(6)F(4)Br-o > C(6)F(5) for n >/= 8. This behavior is understood on the basis of electronic and steric factors. The dinuclear compounds [(-4,4'-C(6)F(4)C(6)F(4)){AuCN(C(6)H(4))(m)()OC(n)()H(2)(n)()(+1)}(2)] display only N mesophases and all the biphenylisocyanide derivatives and phenyl isocyanide compounds with n </= 6 undergo some decomposition upon reaching the clearing point to the isotropic state.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bayón et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: