Key result
A 12-week exercise program improved physical (beta 5.03; 95% CI 1.01-9.04) and general health in men on androgen deprivation therapy, mediated by walking speed, strength, and fatigue.
Why the study?
Does a combined resistance and aerobic exercise program improve perceived physical and general health in men undergoing androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer?
RCT (n=57)
Does a combined resistance and aerobic exercise program improve perceived physical and general health in men undergoing androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer?
A 12-week combined resistance and aerobic exercise program improves physical and general health in men undergoing androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer, with effects mediated by walking speed, upper body strength, and fatigue.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports recommending combined exercise for men on ADT; extends RCT evidence by identifying functional and fatigue mediators.
BACKGROUND: The objective of the current study was to identify mediators of the effects of a combined resistance and aerobic exercise program on perceived physical and general health in men undergoing androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer. METHODS: In total, 57 patients with prostate cancer undergoing androgen deprivation therapy were randomly assigned to 12 weeks of resistance and aerobic exercise or usual care. The outcome measures of physical and general health were assessed by standardized questionnaires. Linear regression analyses were conducted on the residual change scores of the variables. The mediating effects of fatigue, muscle strength, and functional performance on the intervention's effect on physical and general health were examined using the product of coefficients method. Bootstrapping was used to calculate the 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). RESULTS: The exercise intervention was found to significantly improve physical (beta, 5.03; 95% CI, 1.01-9.04) and general health (beta, 12.89; 95% CI, 2.24-23.54). Upper body muscle strength and walking speed significantly mediated the intervention effect on physical health (beta, 2.65; 95% CI, 0.64-5.54), accounting for 53% of the total effect. Walking speed and fatigue were found to be mediators in the intervention effect on general health (beta, 7.52; 95% CI, 2.16-16.92), accounting for 51% of the total effect. CONCLUSIONS: The intervention effects on physical and general health were explained by different mediating mechanisms. Walking speed mediated the intervention effect on both physical and general health. The intervention effect on physical health was further mediated by upper body strength, whereas the effect on general health was mediated by fatigue.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Buffart et al. (2013) conducted an RCT in prostate cancer undergoing androgen deprivation therapy (n=57). resistance and aerobic exercise program vs. usual care was evaluated on perceived physical health (beta 5.03, 95% CI 1.01-9.04). A 12-week exercise program improved physical (beta 5.03; 95% CI 1.01-9.04) and general health in men on androgen deprivation therapy, mediated by walking speed, strength, and fatigue.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: