Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Non‐chelate control is found to be the favored stereochemical outcome in the addition of the 1‐bromo‐1‐lithio‐1‐alkenes 2b and ( S )‐ 5b to O ‐protected lactaldehydes ( S )‐ 1 . Thus diastereoselectivities of 84 to 96% d.e. are reached in the formation of alcohols 3 and 6 , which are converted into the O ‐protected 2,3‐dihydroxyaldehyde 31 or O ‐protected 1,2,3‐triols 24 and 27. In an analogous way, a non‐chelate‐controlled addition of ( R )‐ 5b to ( R )‐3‐(benzyloxy)butyraldehyde ( 14a ) leads to the predominant formation of the diastereomer 15a (92% d.e. after enrichment by chromatography) which yields the alcohol 42a upon debromination, O ‐protection, and ozonolysis. Thus, the carbenoids 2b and 5b enable the introduction of the synthons − CH 2 OH and − CHO into enantiomerically pure aldehydes ( S )‐ 1 and ( R )‐ 14 in a highly stereoselective manner. Relatively low diastereoselectivities are reached in the „mismatched”︁ combination of ( R )‐ 5b with ( S )‐ 1 as well as ( S )‐ 5b with ( R )‐ 14 . The dilithium compound 20b , generated at −78°C, reacts in a retro‐1,4‐Brook rearrangement at −20°C to give vinylsilane 44b after protonation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Braun et al. (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: