Key result
Heart rate variability (SDNN) significantly correlated with Ewing test score (r = -0.40, P = 0.005), with SDNN ≤ 40 ms showing 63% sensitivity and 75% specificity for severe autonomic dysfunction.
Why the study?
Does SDNN accurately detect autonomic dysfunction compared to the Ewing test score in men with advanced cancer?
Observational (n=47)
Does SDNN accurately detect autonomic dysfunction compared to the Ewing test score in men with advanced cancer?
Effect estimate: r = -0.40
p-value: p=0.005
SDNN is a simple and useful alternative to the time-consuming Ewing test score for detecting moderate to severe autonomic dysfunction in men with advanced cancer.
SDNN may aid autonomic screening in advanced cancer; leaves open prospective validation before replacing the Ewing test.
Autonomic dysfunction is common in patients with cancer and may have considerable negative effects on quality of life and mortality. This study retrospectively compared heart rate variability measured by the standard deviation of normal-to-normal intervals (SDNN) to Ewing test score, a composite score from a battery of five defined autonomic tests, in detection of autonomic dysfunction in 47 men with advanced cancer. The Ewing test score has been validated for diagnosis of autonomic dysfunction but is time-consuming and requires considerable patient co-operation; we hypothesised that SDNN, a much simpler test, is a useful alternative. The patients were categorised into three groups according to Ewing score: ≤ 2 (mild or no autonomic dysfunction), 2.5-3 (moderate) and ≥ 3.5 (severe). The SDNN (mean ± SD) for the three groups were 57.1 ± 26.9 ms 62.3 ± 22.4 ms and 37.7 ± 20.3 ms respectively. A significant negative correlation was found between Ewing score and SDNN (r = -0.40, P = 0.005). A SDNN of ≤ 40 ms had 63% sensitivity and 75% specificity in the diagnosis of severe autonomic dysfunction (i.e. Ewing score ≥ 3.5). The positive predictive value of SDNN ≤ 40 ms in predicting moderate/severe autonomic dysfunction was 89%.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guo et al. (2013) conducted an observational in advanced cancer (n=47). Heart rate variability (SDNN) vs. Ewing test score was evaluated on Correlation between Ewing score and SDNN (r = -0.40, p=0.005). Heart rate variability (SDNN) significantly correlated with Ewing test score (r = -0.40, P = 0.005), with SDNN ≤ 40 ms showing 63% sensitivity and 75% specificity for severe autonomic dysfunction.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: