Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
March 22, 2012Circulation Cardiovascular Interventions

Sources of Hospital Variation in Short-Term Readmission Rates After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Key result

Hospital 30-day all-cause readmission rates after PCI varied widely (9.5% to 17.9%), with procedural and postprocedural factors explaining only 10.4% of the between-hospital variance.

Why the study?

What are the sources of hospital variation in short-term readmission rates after percutaneous coronary intervention?

Population

36,060 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention at 24 nonfederal hospitals in Massachusetts…

Design

Cohort

Follow-up

30 days

Authors

Robert W. YehRobert W. YehInterventional / Structural CardiologyKRKenneth RosenfieldHarvard UniversityKZKatya ZelevinskyHarvard University

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Wide unexplained variation in post-PCI readmission rates persists across hospitals; leaves open the impact of unmeasured hospital characteristics on outcomes.

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=36,060)

Multicenter

Yes

Structured PICO

What are the sources of hospital variation in short-term readmission rates after percutaneous coronary intervention?

P
Population
36,060 patients undergoing PCI at 24 nonfederal hospitals in Massachusetts between 2005 and 2008 who survived to discharge, followed for 30 days.
E
Exposure
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)
O
Outcome
30-day, all-cause risk-standardized readmission rates (RSRRs)hard clinical

There is wide variation in 30-day all-cause readmission rates after PCI across hospitals, most of which cannot be explained by identifiable procedural and postprocedural factors.

Cite This Study

Yeh et al. (2012) conducted an observational in Percutaneous coronary intervention (n=36,060). Hospital of treatment vs. Other hospitals was evaluated on 30-day all-cause readmission. Hospital 30-day all-cause readmission rates after PCI varied widely (9.5% to 17.9%), with procedural and postprocedural factors explaining only 10.4% of the between-hospital variance.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a745e95a44b96c1f7dbd05bhttps://doi.org/10.1161/circinterventions.111.967638

Topics

Coronary artery diseaseCoronary CT angiography
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Factors Associated With 30-Day Readmission Rates After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention2011 · 124 citations
  2. 2The performance of US hospitals as reflected in risk‐standardized 30‐day mortality and readmission rates for medicare beneficiaries with pneumonia2010 · 97 citations
  3. 3Do Patient Safety Events Increase Readmissions?2009 · 44 citations
  4. 4Accounting for the mortality benefit of drug-eluting stents in percutaneous coronary intervention: a comparison of methods in a retrospective cohort study2011 · 21 citations
  5. 5Reduced Readmission Rate for Alternating Diagnoses of Heart Failure and Pulmonary Disease after Implementation of B-Type Natriuretic Peptide Testing2004 · 19 citations