Why the study?
Does real-time ultrasonography accurately diagnose deep venous thrombosis of the leg compared to venography in patients with suspected DVT?
Does real-time ultrasonography accurately diagnose deep venous thrombosis of the leg compared to venography in patients with suspected DVT?
Vein compressibility assessed by real-time ultrasonography is a highly accurate method for diagnosing deep venous thrombosis, achieving 96% sensitivity and 97% specificity.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports noninvasive DVT diagnosis by ultrasonography; confirms high accuracy in this cohort but leaves open generalizability and prospective validation.
In a prospective study, 121 consecutive patients with a clinical diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis of the leg were examined with real-time ultrasonography. The findings were correlated with the results of venography. The common femoral vein and the popliteal vein were evaluated for intraluminal echoes and compressibility, and the common femoral vein was also evaluated for an increase in diameter in response to the Valsalva maneuver. The superficial femoral vein and the calf veins were not evaluated. The results indicate that compressibility of the common femoral and popliteal veins is the best indication of deep venous thrombosis, with a sensitivity of 96% and a specificity of 97%. The accuracy of detection was not improved by including data from thrombus visualization or the response of the common femoral vein to the Valsalva maneuver.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Appelman et al. (1987) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: