In an isolated rabbit ventricular muscle model, thiopental exhibits both arrhythmogenic and antiarrhythmic properties, whereas halothane acts purely as an antiarrhythmic agent.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Suggests thiopental may increase arrhythmia risk unlike halothane; leaves open translation from rabbit tissue to perioperative management.
To see if the known properties of thiopental of reducing Ca2+ and K+ fluxes across the myocardial sarcolemma account for its arrhythmogenic action, we have evaluated the effect of the anesthetic on spontaneous contractile activity induced in isolated rabbit papillary muscles. Thiopental (20 mg/l) prolonged the duration of sustained automaticity induced by stimulation at 1-2 Hz in the presence of 1 mumol/l isoproterenol. Thiopental (10, 20 mg/l) shortened the delay before the onset of Ba(2+)-induced automaticity, which involves a decrease in a K+ current. The minimum concentration of Ba2+ required to induce automaticity was lowered by thiopental. Whether spontaneous activities were induced by high frequency stimulation in the presence of isoproterenol or by Ba2+, thiopental lowered the frequency of spontaneous beats. Thus, thiopental appears to have both arrhythmogenic and antiarrhythmic actions, and the former may be unmasked when catecholamines counteract the latter by increasing Ca2+ influx. Like thiopental, halothane (1.0%) decreased the frequency and force of Ba(2+)-induced automatic beats but, unlike thiopental, prolonged the delay before the onset of Ba(2+)-induced automaticity, indicating that halothane acts as a purely antiarrhythmic agent in this type of automaticity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Komai et al. (1991) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: