Key result
Pivarubicin produced significant inhibition of tumor growth and tumor regression in a triple-negative breast cancer mouse model, whereas doxorubicin failed to inhibit tumor growth.
Why the study?
Current multidrug TNBC therapies achieve low cure rates due to drug resistance and cardiotoxicity dose limitations, requiring safer and more effective treatments.
Does pivarubicin improve tumor regression and reduce cardiotoxicity compared to doxorubicin in a mouse model of triple-negative breast cancer?
Does pivarubicin improve tumor regression and reduce cardiotoxicity compared to doxorubicin in a mouse model of triple-negative breast cancer?
Effect estimate: 50% decrease in tumor volume compared with vehicle
Pivarubicin demonstrates superior anti-tumor efficacy and reduced cardiotoxicity compared to doxorubicin in a preclinical model of triple-negative breast cancer.
Caution against clinical adoption from animal data alone; leaves open translation to human triple-negative breast cancer trials.
Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is unresponsive to antiestrogen and anti-HER2 therapies, requiring the use of cytotoxic drug combinations of anthracyclines, taxanes, cyclophosphamide, and platinum compounds. Multidrug therapies achieve pathological cure rates of only 2040%, a consequence of drug resistance and cumulative dose limitations necessitated by the reversible cardiotoxic effects of drug therapy. Safer and more effective treatments for TNBC are required to achieve durable therapeutic responses. This study describes the mechanistic analyses of the novel anthracycline, pivarubicin, and its in vivo efficacy against human primary TNBC. Pivarubicin directly activates PKCd, triggers rapid mitochondrial-dependent apoptosis, and circumvents resistance conferred by overexpression of P-glycoprotein, Bcl-2, Bcl-X L , and Bcr-Abl. As a consequence, pivarubicin is more cytotoxic than doxorubicin against MDA-MB-231, and SUM159 TNBC cell lines grown in both monolayer culture and tumorspheres. Comparative in vivo efficacy of pivarubicin and doxorubicin was performed in an orthotopic NSG mouse model implanted with MDA-MB-231 human TNBC cells and treated with the maximum tolerated doses (MTDs) of pivarubicin and doxorubicin. Tumor growth was monitored by digital caliper measurements and determination of endpoint tumor weight and volume. Endpoint cardiotoxicity was assessed histologically by identifying microvacuolization in ventricular cardiomyocytes. Primary tumors treated with multiple rounds of doxorubicin at MTD failed to inhibit tumor growth compared with vehicle-treated tumors. However, administration of a single MTD of pivarubicin produced significant inhibition of tumor growth and tumor regression relative to tumor volume prior to initiation of treatment. Histological analysis of hearts excised from drug- and vehicle-treated mice revealed that pivarubicin produced no evidence of myocardial damage at a therapeutic dose. These results support the development of pivarubicin as a safer and more effective replacement for doxorubicin against TNBC as well as other malignancies for which doxorubicin therapy is indicated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lothstein et al. (2020) studied Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) (n=30). Pivarubicin vs. Doxorubicin and vehicle was evaluated on Tumor volume (50% decrease in tumor volume compared with vehicle). Pivarubicin produced significant inhibition of tumor growth and tumor regression in a triple-negative breast cancer mouse model, whereas doxorubicin failed to inhibit tumor growth.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: