Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Establishing a complete and innovative decision-making system may help budget-strapped governments control the overall operation of their science and technology (S&T) programs and integrate and maximize available resources to achieve optimal configurations for each program. This study, which is based on the theoretical framework of a national innovation system, establishes a fully optimized performance monitoring and evaluation (M&E) platform and provides recommendations for interim monitoring and M&E mechanisms. Based on meetings and interviews with experts, the results of the study show that an ideal process for performance M&E should include the establishment of a review committee, performance indexes for examination, interim monitoring and an M&E mechanism, and the effective tracking of program results. The results also indicate that a complete performance M&E platform for S&T programs should be based on the dimensions of functioning, data build, indicator input, data value-added, and user feedback and interaction. These measures not only help governments apply their performance budget systems and S&T resources, but also improve the efficiency and benefits of S&T programs, policies and systems, program review, and resource allocation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yeh et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: