Key result
Non-persistence in older PAD patients is linked to ~12 percentage points higher prior antiplatelet non-adherence.
Why the study?
Adherence to antiplatelet agents is required for effective secondary prevention of PAD, but adherence patterns and characteristics associated with non-adherence needed evaluation separately in persistent and non-persistent patients.
Does medication non-adherence (PDC < 80%) differ between persistent and non-persistent older patients taking antiplatelet agents for peripheral arterial disease?
Cohort (n=9,178)
Does medication non-adherence (PDC < 80%) differ between persistent and non-persistent older patients taking antiplatelet agents for peripheral arterial disease?
Over 70% of older PAD patients who eventually discontinue antiplatelet therapy actually maintain good adherence (PDC >= 80%) prior to stopping, indicating abrupt treatment cessation rather than gradual poor implementation and highlighting the need for ongoing patient education on lifelong secondary prevention.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Highlights abrupt cessation over gradual non-adherence in older PAD; leaves open whether targeted interventions improve long-term persistence.
Secondary prevention of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) includes administration of antiplatelet agents, and adherence to medication is a requirement for an effective treatment. The aim of this study was to analyse adherence measured using the proportion of days covered (PDC) index separately in persistent and non-persistent patients, and to identify patient- and medication-related characteristics associated with non-adherence in these patient groups. The study cohort of 9178 patients aged ≥ 65 years in whom PAD was diagnosed in 1/-12/2012 included 6146 persistent and 3032 non-persistent patients. Non-adherence was identified as PDC < 80%. Characteristics associated with non-adherence were determined using the binary logistic regression model. In the group of persistent patients, 15.3% of subjects were identified as non-adherent, while among non-persistent patients, 26.9% of subjects were non-adherent to antiplatelet medication. Administration of dual antiplatelet therapy (aspirin and clopidogrel) and a general practitioner as index prescriber were associated with adherence in both patient groups. Our study revealed a relatively high proportion of adherent patients not only in the group of persistent patients but also in the group of non-persistent patients before discontinuation. These results indicate that most non-persistent PAD patients discontinue antiplatelet treatment rapidly after a certain period of adherence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wawruch et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) (n=9,178). Non-persistence with antiplatelet medication (aspirin, clopidogrel, ticlopidine) defined as a treatment gap >= 6 months vs. Persistence with antiplatelet medication over the 5-year follow-up was evaluated on Non-adherence to antiplatelet medication (defined as proportion of days covered [PDC] < 80%) during the persistent treatment phase (p=<0.001). Non-persistent older PAD patients had a higher rate of antiplatelet non-adherence before discontinuation compared to persistent patients (26.9% vs 15.3%, p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: