Key result
Hypertensive patients with mild diastolic dysfunction demonstrated a significant reduction in global longitudinal strain (-12% vs -15%, P=0.01) compared to those with normal diastolic function.
Cross-Sectional (n=58)
In hypertensive patients, the presence of mild diastolic dysfunction is associated with proportional reductions in longitudinal strain across all myocardial layers and impaired longitudinal mechanical relaxation.
May indicate early subclinical impairment in hypertensive mild DD; leaves open GLS role in diastolic assessment or risk stratification.
This study sought to examine layer-specific longitudinal and circumferential systolic and diastolic strain, strain rate (SR) and diastolic time intervals in hypertensive patients with and without diastolic dysfunction. Fifty-eight treated hypertensive patients were assigned to normal diastolic function (NDF, N = 39) or mild diastolic dysfunction (DD, N = 19) group. Layer-specific systolic and diastolic longitudinal and circumferential strains and SR were assessed. Results showed no between-group difference in left ventricular mass index (DD: 92.1 ± 18.1 vs NDF: 88.4 ± 16.3; P = 0.44). Patients with DD had a proportional reduction in longitudinal strain across the myocardium (endocardial for DD −13 ± 4%; vs NDF −17 ± 3, P < 0.01; epicardial for DD −10 ± 3% vs NDF −13 ± 3%, P < 0.01; global for DD: −12 ± 3% vs NDF: −15 ± 3, P = 0.01), and longitudinal mechanical diastolic impairments as evidenced by reduced longitudinal strain rate of early diastole (DD 0.7 ± 0.2 L/s vs NDF 1.0 ± 0.3 L/s, P < 0.01) and absence of a transmural gradient in the duration of diastolic strain (DD endocardial: 547 ± 105 ms vs epicardial: 542 ± 113 ms, P = 0.24; NDF endocardial: 566 ± 86 ms vs epicardial: 553 ± 77 ms, P = 0.03). Patients with DD also demonstrate a longer duration of early circumferential diastolic strain (231 ± 71 ms vs 189 ± 58 ms, P = 0.02). In conclusion, hypertensive patients with mild DD demonstrate a proportional reduction in longitudinal strain across the myocardium, as well as longitudinal mechanical diastolic impairment, and prolonging duration of circumferential mechanical relaxation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sharif et al. (2018) conducted a cross-sectional in Hypertension (n=58). Mild diastolic dysfunction vs. Normal diastolic function was evaluated on Global longitudinal strain (p=0.01). Hypertensive patients with mild diastolic dysfunction demonstrated a significant reduction in global longitudinal strain (-12% vs -15%, P=0.01) compared to those with normal diastolic function.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: