Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Classification of remotely sensed data with artificial neural networks is called neuro-classification, and this technique has shown great potential. The amount of data used for training a neural network affects the accuracy and efficiency of the neural network classifier. A neural network was trained separately with 5, 10, 15, and 20 per cent of image data from a Landsat Thematic Mapper scene, which was acquired 29 July 1987 for an agricultural region within Indiana, U.S.A. At a risk level of 5 per cent, the results showed that (a) classifiers NN-5% (neuro-classification with 5 per cent of the image data used for training), AW-10%, and AW-15% did not differ from one another, (b) classifiers AW-15% and AW-20% did not differ from each other, but (c) classifiers NN-5% and AW-10% differed from classifier AW-20%. The training rates were reduced by more than 10 seconds cycle-1 as we increased the percentage of the image data for training a neural network. Approximately 5-10 per cent of the image data are needed to train a neural network classifier adequately to obtain satisfactory performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhuang et al. (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: