Key result
Novel LF/HF discriminant index reduces arterial tonometry measurement variability by ~13%.
Why the study?
Accurate arterial tonometry requires proper device wearing, but evaluating wearing conditions using pulse wave amplitude has been complicated by large variability.
Does the ratio of low-frequency to high-frequency blood pressure pulse wave components (LF/HF) reduce variability compared to pulse wave amplitude (AP) when evaluating the wearing condition of a radial arterial tonometry blood pressure device?
Does the ratio of low-frequency to high-frequency blood pressure pulse wave components (LF/HF) reduce variability compared to pulse wave amplitude (AP) when evaluating the wearing condition of a radial arterial tonometry blood pressure device?
Using the ratio of low-to-high frequency pulse wave components (LF/HF) provides a less variable metric than pulse wave amplitude for confirming proper sensor contact pressure in wearable radial tonometry blood pressure monitors.
In this paper, we report a new discriminant index for evaluating the wearing condition of a blood pressure pulse wave measurement device with small variability. The prototype device consists of MEMS 3-axis force sensors, a 3-axis push-in adjustment mechanism, a fixed jig, and a signal processing board. The arterial tonometry method is used by this device to measure blood pressure pulse waves. However, to accurately measure the blood pressure pulse wave, the device must be appropriately worn. The evaluation of the wearing condition using the amplitude of the blood pressure pulse wave was complicated by the wearing process due to the large variability. Therefore, we propose the ratio of the blood pressure pulse wave component to the noise component as an index that can evaluate the wear condition of the device. The correlation coefficient between the discriminant index and the amplitude of the blood pressure pulse wave had a correlation coefficient of 0.879. Furthermore, the discriminant index reduced the coefficient of variation by 12.8%. Therefore, it was suggested that the discriminant index is an index that can evaluate the pressing amount, one of the wearing conditions of the blood pressure pulse wave measurement device with a small influence of variation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Osawa et al. (2022) studied Healthy volunteer for blood pressure pulse wave measurement (n=1). Discriminant index (LF/HF ratio of low-frequency to high-frequency blood pressure pulse wave components) using a prototype MEMS 3-axis force sensor arterial tonometry device vs. Amplitude of the blood pressure pulse wave (AP) was evaluated on Correlation coefficient with blood pressure pulse wave amplitude (AP) and coefficient of variation across 20 repeated wearing experiments (R = 0.879; CV reduced by 12.8%). The proposed LF/HF discriminant index strongly correlated with pulse wave amplitude (R = 0.879) and reduced the coefficient of variation by 12.8% (0.183 vs 0.210) across 20 experiments.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: