Key result
This review describes the histological and pathophysiological rationale for the five pulmonary hypertension groups defined at the Nice World Symposium, highlighting shared disease pathomechanisms.
Why the study?
This article reviews the rationale of histology, pathology, and pathobiology underlying the five diagnostic pulmonary hypertension categories redefined at the Nice World Symposium.
This review highlights the histological and pathophysiological basis of the Nice classification for pulmonary hypertension, emphasizing shared pathomechanisms across different clinical groups.
Reinforces Nice PH classification rationale; leaves open whether shared mechanisms inform cross-group therapies.
Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a devastating condition that ultimately leads to right heart failure and death, if untreated. The morphological correlate for clinically relevant PH is pulmonary vascular disease that may concern all vascular compartments of the lung: pulmonary arteries, capillaries and veins, but also systemic lung vessels, commonly known as bronchial arteries and vasa vasorum. The recent diagnostic PH classification at the PH World Symposium in Nice, France, redefined five PH groups based on pathophysiological, histological and clinical differences. This article reviews the rationale of histology/pathology and, partly, pathobiology that has led to these different categories of PH. Even if aetiology and initial pathophysiology discriminate these groups to some extent, it has become clear that several disease-relevant pathomechanisms are shared between the groups, leading to comparable therapeutic molecular targets, such as phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors for PAH (group 1 in the Nice classification) and soluble guanylate cyclase agonists in CTEPH (group 4 of the Nice classification). When considering PH group 2 (PH due to left heart disease), its histological appearance, with remodelled small pulmonary veins and arteries, and its haemodynamics in some patients suggest an overreacting pre-capillary vasculature in response to left heart failure. Thus the still-used descriptor ‘orphan disease' might one day no longer be used in relation to PH. Indeed, PH is a condition that represents a global health issue, and hence is worth a closer look and a thorough definition from the perspective of the pathologist.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ghigna et al. (2019) conducted a review in Pulmonary hypertension. This review describes the histological and pathophysiological rationale for the five pulmonary hypertension groups defined at the Nice World Symposium, highlighting shared disease pathomechanisms.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: