Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We use high-resolution N -body simulations to study the galaxy-cluster cross sections and the abundance of giant arcs in the ΛCDM model. Clusters are selected from the simulations using the friends-of-friends method, and their cross sections for forming giant arcs are analyzed. The background sources are assumed to follow a uniform ellipticity distribution from 0 to 0.5 and to have an area identical to a circular source with diameter 1''. We find that the optical depth scales as the source redshift approximately as τ = 2.25 × 10 -6 /[1 + ( z s /3.14) -3.42 ] (0.6 < z s < 7). The amplitude is about 50% higher for an effective source diameter of 0.″5. The optimal lens redshift for giant arcs with the length-to-width ( L/W ) ratio larger than 10 increases from 0.3 for z s = 1, to 0.5 for z s = 2, and to 0.7-0.8 for z s > 3. The optical depth is sensitive to the source redshift, in qualitative agreement with Wambsganss et al. (2004). However, our overall optical depth appears to be only ~10%-70% of those from previous studies. The differences can be mostly explained by the different power spectrum normalizations (σ 8 ) used and different ways of determining the L/W ratio. Finite source size and ellipticity have modest effects on the optical depth. We also found that the number of highly magnified (with magnification |μ| > 10) and "undistorted" images (with L / W < 3) is comparable to the number of giant arcs with |μ| > 10 and L / W > 10. We conclude that our predicted rate of giant arcs may be lower than the observed rate, although the precise "discrepancy" is still unclear due to uncertainties in both theory and observations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: