Why the study?
The study aimed to review accessible literature and comparative studies evaluating the effectiveness of the ERAS concept in patients after surgical interventions in surgical emergency units, and to present its adoption in the Czech Republic.
Does the ERAS protocol improve recovery and reduce complications in patients after surgical interventions?
Does the ERAS protocol improve recovery and reduce complications in patients after surgical interventions?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The ERAS protocol improves perioperative care by reducing complications and hospital stay, though its implementation in the Czech Republic remains limited.
Introduction: The objective of the survey study is to the accessible world literature sources and comparative studies dealing with the effectivity of the ERAS concept in the patients after the surgical interventions in the surgical emergency units and to present adoption of concept in the Czech Republic. Method: For searching of the needed information and data they were used the literature sources and comparative studies from the open access and licensed database sources (Scopus, SpringerLink, Medline Complete, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, ProQuest, EBSCOhost, Wiley Online Library). The conclusions of the concrete comparative studies dealing with the conceptual effectivity of the perioperative care ERAS were analysed. On the analytical base of the gained information drawing from the accessible literature and from 8 quantitative studies published in the years 2009-2013. Results: It is clear that following of the ERAS protocol principle in the surgical workplaces in the Czech Republic is adopted only in the limitation of the routine application of the nasogastric probe, application of epidural analgesia and parenteral preoperative nutritional support if enteral not possible. Conclusion: The positive effect of the new way of the perioperative care, ERAS is proved as for the qualitative improvement of the treatment and nursing process, as for decreasing of the postoperative complications and shortening of the hospitalization period including decreasing of the economic expenditures connected to the treatment and hospitalization of the surgical patients. In comparison with established ERAS protocol, in the Czech Republic the principles are put into effect less significantly. The mentioned experiences and results can be the useful source for the next surgical workplaces.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jana et al. (2020) conducted a review in Surgical patients in intensive care. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol vs. Traditional perioperative care was evaluated.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: