Key result
The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol significantly increased the proportion of patients discharged on post-operative day 4 compared to standard care (90% vs 12.5%, p<0.0001).
Why the study?
Evidence regarding the necessary components of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) for the obstetric population is limited.
Does an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol improve recovery parameters and patient satisfaction in women undergoing elective cesarean section?
Observational (n=100)
Open-label
No
Does an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol improve recovery parameters and patient satisfaction in women undergoing elective cesarean section?
Absolute Event Rate: 90% vs 12.5%
p-value: p=<0.0001
The application of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol in elective cesarean section significantly reduced hospital stay and improved patient satisfaction without increasing complications.
May support earlier cesarean discharge; hypothesis-generating pending randomized confirmation.
Background: Concept of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) has been applied in various surgical branches. Evidence regarding the necessary components of ERAS for obstetric population is limited. Therefore, objective of this study was to test the application of ERAS in patients undergoing elective caesarean section on the post-operative recovery process.Methods: The study was conducted in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NMCH, Patna from January 2014 to December 2014. A total of 100 patients (n=100) undergoing elective caesarean section were included in the study. Cases were allocated into two groups a) Study group included 60 patients (n=60) and ERAS protocol was followed b) Control group included 40 patients (n=40) and standard post-operative care protocol was followed. Two groups were compared with respect to recovery parameters, post-operative complications and satisfaction rates.Results: More patients in the ERAS group were discharged on post-operative day 4 than the standard postoperative care group (90% vs 12.5%, p<0.0001). More patient in the ERAS group were significantly satisfied with the protocol compared to standard post-operative care (77% vs 70%, p<0.04). Approximately 77 percent of the patients in the ERAS group rated the satisfication score between 8-10 compared to 70 percent of the patients in control group (p<0.04). There was no difference between two groups with respect to recatheterization rate, readmission rate and post-discharge complaints.Conclusions: In this study with application of ERAS protocol, we reported reduced hospital stay which may reduce financial burden of patients and healthcare facilities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pravina et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Elective cesarean section (n=100). Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol vs. Standard post-operative care was evaluated on Discharge on post-operative day 4 (p=<0.0001). The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol significantly increased the proportion of patients discharged on post-operative day 4 compared to standard care (90% vs 12.5%, p<0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: