Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We evaluated the predictive value of radiomics features from different peritumoral ranges for the invasiveness of ground-glass nodular lung adenocarcinoma using various machine learning models. This retrospective study included 317 patients with 323 ground-glass nodules diagnosed as minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA) or invasive adenocarcinoma (IAC) at Benxi Central Hospital (January 2019-December 2023). Radiomic features from tumor margins of 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 mm were extracted. Eight machine learning models were constructed following dimensionality reduction. The models were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curves. All models had area under the curve values > 0.75, effectively distinguishing between MIA and IAC. Only the decision tree model showed statistically significant differences (P < 0.05); no differences were found between the other models (P > 0.05). In the training set, the 1-mm margin model achieved the highest ranking, followed by the 2-, 4-, 5-, and 3-mm models. In the validation group, the 3-mm margin model ranked the highest, followed by the 2-, 1-, 4-, and 5-mm models, with no statistically significant differences (P > 0.05). All machine learning models demonstrated good predictive performance for both MIA and IAC. Radiomic features from 1 to 5-mm margins showed strong predictive value, though no optimal margin range was identified.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: