Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We explored the feasibility of utilizing immediate changes in flight time-based vertical countermovement jump height as an on-field measure for fatigue-induced decrements in performance. Comparing Inertial Measurement Units (IMUs) worn at five body locations (feet, shorts for thighs and pelvis, waist strap, and thorax in a standard GPS vest) with a force plate as a reference, we enlisted 19 amateur football players who performed a series of 10 maximal 30 m sprints (initiated every minute). Maximal jumps were executed immediately before and after each sprint, with the latter jumps recorded on a force plate integrated into the field. Bland Altman's bias (-0.49 cm) and limits of agreement (1.01 cm) were minimal for the feet IMUs. The thorax IMU had the highest bias (-6.35 cm), but the limits of agreement (2.73 cm) were similar to the other locations. Repeated measures correlations (rmcorr) between force plate and IMUs were excellent for the feet (rmcorr = 0.98) and good for the thorax (rmcorr = 0.86) and other locations except for the waist strap. In the fatigued state, within-session coefficients of variation ranged from 4.0% (pelvis in shorts) to 6.5% (waist strap). These findings suggest that body-worn IMUs possess the potential for a prompt and straightforward on-field vertical jump assessment to monitor acute fatigue.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ruiter et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: