This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Objective: To create a conceptual framework for assessing patient-reported diagnostic excellence of a single diagnostic encounter. Methods: We held multiple expert panel meetings to prioritize a priori identified diagnostically relevant patient-reported experience and outcome domains. We combined and synthesized expert feedback with our experience in measure development and the reflections of a patient focus group. We then developed the framework, SEE-Dx-PRM (Single-Encounter Elicitation Framework for Diagnostic Excellence Patient-Reported Measures). Results: We defined the SEE-Dx-PRM's scope as intended for a single diagnostic encounter in emergency or urgent care, prospective and agnostic of the health condition, and with a timeframe of within several days up to a month from the encounter. The SEE-Dx-PRM's diagnostic excellence outcomes are: (1) accurate diagnosis and (2) either final, or working diagnosis, or specific next steps to establish diagnosis that were communicated and comprehended by patients. SEE-Dx-PRM encompasses 2 domains associated with accurate diagnosis, 5 domains of patient perception of iterative diagnostic process, 5 domains associated with communication and comprehension, and a domain associated with uncertainty. Conclusion: SEE-Dx-PRM-informed measures might support quality improvement, prompt system response, and research on diagnostic excellence. Innovation: SEE-Dx-PRM presents a novel patient-centered framework for the emerging diagnostic excellence construct and its measurement.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dukhanin et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: