Key result
A 15-protein risk score was significantly associated with all-cause mortality (random effects HR 1.79) and improved mortality prediction when added to clinical covariates in smoking-enriched cohorts.
Why the study?
Protein biomarkers are associated with cardiovascular mortality, but their utility for predicting respiratory and all-cause mortality over clinical risk factors in smokers was unclear.
Does a blood-based protein risk score improve the prediction of all-cause and respiratory mortality over traditional clinical risk factors in smokers?
Cohort (n=2,232)
Yes
Does a blood-based protein risk score improve the prediction of all-cause and respiratory mortality over traditional clinical risk factors in smokers?
Hazard Ratio: 1.79 (95% CI 1.31–2.43)
A 15-protein blood-based risk score improves the prediction of all-cause and respiratory mortality over traditional clinical risk factors in specific cohorts of smokers.
Protein biomarkers are associated with mortality in cardiovascular disease, but their effect on predicting respiratory and all-cause mortality is not clear. We tested whether a protein risk score (protRS) can improve prediction of all-cause mortality over clinical risk factors in smokers. We utilized smoking-enriched (COPDGene, LSC, SPIROMICS) and general population-based (MESA) cohorts with SomaScan proteomic and mortality data. We split COPDGene into training and testing sets (50:50) and developed a protRS based on respiratory mortality effect size and parsimony. We tested multivariable associations of the protRS with all-cause, respiratory, and cardiovascular mortality, and performed meta-analysis, area-under-the-curve (AUC), and network analyses. We included 2232 participants. In COPDGene, a penalized regression-based protRS was most highly associated with respiratory mortality (OR 9.2) and parsimonious (15 proteins). This protRS was associated with all-cause mortality (random effects HR 1.79 [95% CI 1.31-2.43]). Adding the protRS to clinical covariates improved all-cause mortality prediction in COPDGene (AUC 0.87 vs 0.82) and SPIROMICS (0.74 vs 0.6), but not in LSC and MESA. Protein-protein interaction network analyses implicate cytokine signaling, innate immune responses, and extracellular matrix turnover. A blood-based protein risk score predicts all-cause and respiratory mortality, identifies potential drivers of mortality, and demonstrates heterogeneity in effects amongst cohorts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Moll et al. (2024) conducted a cohort in Smokers and general population (n=2,232). Protein risk score (protRS) vs. Lower protein risk score was evaluated on All-cause mortality (HR 1.79, 95% CI 1.31-2.43). A 15-protein risk score was significantly associated with all-cause mortality (random effects HR 1.79) and improved mortality prediction when added to clinical covariates in smoking-enriched cohorts.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: