Key result
A contact pressure of 54 mmHg provided the most accurate photoplethysmographic heart rate measurements during physical activity, with a Pearson correlation coefficient ranging from 0.81 to 0.95.
Why the study?
Accuracy in photoplethysmographic heart rate readings is unreliable during physical activity, and contact pressure between the sensor and skin greatly influences the signals.
Does optimal contact pressure improve the accuracy of photoplethysmographic heart rate measurements compared to an ECG chest strap during physical activity?
Cross-Sectional (n=17)
Does optimal contact pressure improve the accuracy of photoplethysmographic heart rate measurements compared to an ECG chest strap during physical activity?
Effect estimate: Pearson correlation coefficient 0.81 to 0.95; mean average percentage error 2.4% to 3.8%
Optimizing contact pressure to 54 mmHg significantly improves the accuracy of wristband PPG heart rate measurements during physical activity.
Optimal contact pressure may enhance wearable PPG HR accuracy during activity; leaves open need for validation before clinical adoption.
Heart rate (HR) as an important physiological indicator could properly describe global subject's physical status. Photoplethysmographic (PPG) sensors are catching on in field of wearable sensors, combining the advantages in costs, weight and size. Nevertheless, accuracy in HR readings is unreliable specifically during physical activity. Among several identified sources that affect PPG recording, contact pressure (CP) between the PPG sensor and skin greatly influences the signals. METHODS: In this study, the accuracy of HR measurements of a PPG sensor at different CP was investigated when compared with a commercial ECG-based chest strap used as a test control, with the aim of determining the optimal CP to produce a reliable signal during physical activity. Seventeen subjects were enrolled for the study to perform a physical activity at three different rates repeated at three different contact pressures of the PPG-based wristband. RESULTS: The results show that the CP of 54 mmHg provides the most accurate outcome with a Pearson correlation coefficient ranging from 0.81 to 0.95 and a mean average percentage error ranging from 3.8% to 2.4%, based on the physical activity rate. CONCLUSION: Authors found that changes in the CP have greater effects on PPG-HR signal quality than those deriving from the intensity of the physical activity and specifically, the individual best CP for each subject provided reliable HR measurements even for a high intensity of physical exercise with a Bland-Altman plot within ±11 bpm. Although future studies on a larger cohort of subjects are still needed, this study could contribute a profitable indication to enhance accuracy of PPG-based wearable devices.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Scardulla et al. (2020) reported a cross-sectional. Different contact pressures of a PPG-based wristband vs. Commercial ECG-based chest strap was evaluated on Accuracy of heart rate measurements (Pearson correlation coefficient 0.81 to 0.95; mean average percentage error 2.4% to 3.8%). A contact pressure of 54 mmHg provided the most accurate photoplethysmographic heart rate measurements during physical activity, with a Pearson correlation coefficient ranging from 0.81 to 0.95.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: