Key result
Simulated comparisons suggest withholding anticoagulation for one month in favor of modern DAPT may offer a favorable risk-to-benefit ratio in AF-ACS patients with moderately low embolic risk.
Why the study?
Triple therapy carries high bleeding risk and dual therapy with anticoagulation may offer suboptimal early coronary protection, while both preclude modern potent P2Y12 inhibitors in AF patients after ACS.
Does temporary modern DAPT (withholding anticoagulation for one month) improve the risk-to-benefit ratio compared to TAT or DAT in patients with AF early after ACS?
Does temporary modern DAPT (withholding anticoagulation for one month) improve the risk-to-benefit ratio compared to TAT or DAT in patients with AF early after ACS?
In AF patients early after ACS, a simulated strategy of withholding anticoagulation for one month in favor of modern DAPT may offer a favorable balance of ischemic and bleeding risks for those with CHA2DS2VASc 2-4.
DAT with NOAC cuts bleeding without excess ischemia in AF+ACS; extends RCT evidence supporting guideline-preferred regimens.
The combination of atrial fibrillation (AF) and acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is a complex situation in which a three-dimensional risk—cardioembolic, coronary, and hemorrhagic—has to be carefully managed. Triple antithrombotic therapy (TAT) is burdened with a high risk of serious bleeding, while dual antithrombotic therapy with an anticoagulant (DAT) likely provides only suboptimal coronary protection early after stent implantation. Moreover, TAT precludes the advantages provided by the use of the latest and more potent P2Y12 inhibitors in ACS patients. Here, we aimed to simulate and compare the expected coronary, cardioembolic, and hemorrhagic outcomes offered by DAT, TAT, or modern dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin plus one of the latest P2Y12 inhibitors in AF patients early after an ACS. The comparison of numbers needed to treat to prevent major adverse events with the various antithrombotic regimens suggests that AF–ACS patients at high ischemic and hemorrhagic risk and at moderately low embolic risk (CHA2DS2VASc score 2–4) might safely withhold anticoagulation after revascularization for one month taking advantage of a modern DAPT, with a favorable risk-to-benefit ratio. In conclusion, this strategy, not sufficiently addressed in recent European and North American guidelines or consensus documents, adds to the spectrum of treatment options in these difficult patients; it might be the best choice in a substantial number of patients; and should be prospectively tested in a randomized controlled trial.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Limbruno et al. (2020) studied Atrial fibrillation and acute coronary syndrome. Temporary dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) vs. Triple antithrombotic therapy (TAT) or dual antithrombotic therapy (DAT) was evaluated on Major adverse events (coronary, cardioembolic, and hemorrhagic outcomes). Simulated comparisons suggest withholding anticoagulation for one month in favor of modern DAPT may offer a favorable risk-to-benefit ratio in AF-ACS patients with moderately low embolic risk.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: