PURPOSE: To prospectively compare the results of coronary artery calcium (CAC) measurements obtained with 55- and 165-mAs electrocardiographically gated multi-detector row computed tomography (CT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional clinical study review board approval and written informed consent were obtained. Fifty-one consecutive subjects (mean age, 59 years +/- 10) were scanned consecutively by using 165 and 55 mAs. For each examination, the number of lesions, total calcium score (TCS) calculated with Agatston algorithm (130-HU threshold), and calcium mass (in milligrams) were measured. Noise was measured by averaging 1 standard deviation of the CT attenuation values in five consecutive transverse sections of the ascending aorta. Paired t test and Pearson correlation were used to compare measurements between the examinations. RESULTS: By using 55 mAs, CAC was detected (TCS > 0) in all 33 subjects in whom CAC was initially detected with 165 mAs. The mean values of CAC measures with 165 and 55 mAs, respectively, were as follows: number of lesions, 6.2 +/- 9.6 and 6.1 +/- 9.4; TCS, 123 +/- 223 and 126 +/- 225; and calcium mass, 23.25 mg +/- 43 and 24.25 mg +/- 44 (P value was not significant for all parameters). Significant high correlation was found between the two methods for all measures (r > 0.90, P < .01). Similar results were obtained with analysis by coronary vessel. Image noise was 9.3 HU +/- 2.1 with 165 mAs and 14.7 HU +/- 3.9 with 55 mAs (P < .001), with a parallel decrease in the volume CT dose index from 12 to 4 mGy. CONCLUSION: Radiation dose can be reduced (eg, 55 mAs) for CAC detection and measurement at multi-detector row CT and provides results comparable to those obtained with 165 mAs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shemesh et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: