Key result
Hospitals with the largest reductions in surgical mortality achieved these improvements primarily through reducing failure to rescue rates (explaining 64% of improvement) rather than serious complications.
Why the study?
Surgical mortality has declined, but the relative impact of reducing postoperative complications versus improving failure to rescue on postoperative mortality rates remains unclear.
Observational (n=702,268)
Yes
Absolute Event Rate: 5.7% vs 7.7%
p-value: p=< 0.001
Improvements in surgical mortality over a decade were primarily driven by reductions in failure to rescue rather than reductions in serious complication rates.
Reducing failure to rescue may lower surgical mortality; observational data leaves open whether targeted interventions improve outcomes.
In Brief Objective: To evaluate how changes in complication and failure to rescue rates influence hospitals’ postoperative mortality rates. Summary Background Data: Surgical mortality has declined over the last decade, but the mechanisms underlying these improvements are unknown. Specifically, the relative impact of reducing postoperative complications versus improving “failure to rescue” remains unclear. Methods: Using Medicare claims data, we performed a retrospective study of abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, pulmonary resection, colectomy, and pancreatectomy patients. We examined risk-adjusted 30-day mortality, serious complications, and failure to rescue for these patients in from 2005 to 2014 (n = 702,268 patients in 3404 hospitals). Hospitals were then stratified into quintiles by their change in mortality over time. Results: After stratifying by reductions in mortality from 2005 to 2014, the top 20% of hospitals decreased mortality by 37% (9.0%–5.7%, P < 0.001), decreased serious complications by 11% (15.2%–13.5%, P < 0.001), and decreased failure to rescue by 25% (25.2%–18.9%, P < 0.001). In contrast, the bottom 20% of hospitals increased mortality by 12% (6.9%–7.7%, P < 0.001), increased serious complications by 5% (14.6%–15.4%, P < 0.001), and increased failure to rescue by 4% (21.5%–22.3%, P < 0.001). Partitioning of variance demonstrated that decreased failure to rescue explained 64% of improvement in hospitals’ mortality over time, whereas decreased serious complications accounted for only 5% of this improvement. Conclusions: Hospitals with the largest reductions in surgical mortality achieved these improvements primarily through reducing failure to rescue rates and not by reducing serious complication rates. This suggests that hospitals aiming to reduce surgical mortality should engage in efforts focused on improving rescue.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fry et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, pulmonary resection, colectomy, and pancreatectomy (n=702,268). Top 20% of hospitals by mortality reduction vs. Bottom 20% of hospitals by mortality reduction was evaluated on 30-day mortality at end of study period (2014) (p=< 0.001). Hospitals with the largest reductions in surgical mortality achieved these improvements primarily through reducing failure to rescue rates (explaining 64% of improvement) rather than serious complications.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: