Key result
A population health management approach did not improve the use of guideline-recommended medications, including ACEi/ARB (p=0.46), statins (p=0.12), and SGLT2i/GLP1RA (p=0.80), compared to usual care.
Why the study?
Use of guideline-recommended medication therapy to improve kidney and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease is suboptimal.
Does a population health management approach improve the use of guideline-recommended medication therapy in patients with high-risk CKD compared to usual care?
RCT (n=1,596)
randomized
Does a population health management approach improve the use of guideline-recommended medication therapy in patients with high-risk CKD compared to usual care?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A population health management approach utilizing electronic health records and e-consults did not significantly improve the prescription of guideline-directed medical therapies in high-risk CKD patients compared to usual care.
Background: Use of guideline-recommended medication therapy to improve kidney and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is suboptimal. Kidney CHAMP is a pragmatic randomized controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of a population health management (PHM) approach to improve CKD care. The intervention leveraged electronic health records to identify patients with CKD at high risk of progression and communicate recommendations from a nephrologist-led e-consult and pharmacist-led medication review to primary care providers (PCP) randomized to the intervention group. We compared the use of guideline-recommended medication therapy in patients in the intervention group vs patients receiving usual care per their PCP. Methods: Eligible patients were 18-85 years with high-risk CKD and not followed by a nephrologist. Guideline-recommended medication therapy included use of ACE inhibitor (ACEi) or angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) if baseline urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) ≥ 300 mg/g, moderate or high intensity statin if baseline age ≤ 75 years, and SGLT2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) and/or GLP1 receptor agonist (GLP1RA). Changes in medication use between groups were tested using logistic regression via generalized estimating equations. Results: Among 1596 patients enrolled, 58% were females, the mean age was 74 years, mean eGFR 37 mL/min/1.73m2, and mean UACR 410 mg/g at baseline. Comorbidities included hypertension (95%), diabetes (64%), and cardiovascular disease (78%). Over a median 18 month study period, ACEi/ARB use changed from 49% to 43% (p=0.10) vs 51% to 40% (p=0.005), statin use changed from 52% to 55% (p=0.55) vs 54% to 50% (p=0.25), and SGLT2i and/or GLP1RA use changed from 9% to 20% (p<0.001) vs 5% to 13% (p<0.001) in the intervention vs usual care groups, respectively. There was no between group difference in the change in ACEi/ARB (p=0.46), statin (p=0.12), or SGLT2i and/or GLP1RA (p=0.80) use. Conclusions: A PHM approach did not improve use of guideline-recommended medication therapy in patients with high-risk CKD compared to usual care. This research supports a need to address barriers in the primary care setting, including therapeutic inertia and access to clear practice guidelines, and efforts to improve the delivery of CKD care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Weltman et al. (2023) conducted an RCT in chronic kidney disease (n=1,596). Population health management (PHM) approach vs. Usual care was evaluated on Change in use of guideline-recommended medication therapy (ACEi/ARB, statin, SGLT2i/GLP1RA). A population health management approach did not improve the use of guideline-recommended medications, including ACEi/ARB (p=0.46), statins (p=0.12), and SGLT2i/GLP1RA (p=0.80), compared to usual care.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: