Key result
The Yo-Yo intermittent endurance level 1 test induced maximal heart rate in 73% of players, compared to 17% for a standard treadmill test, providing the most accurate estimation.
Why the study?
The study examined the suitability of a standard treadmill test, intermittent field tests, and small-sided football matches to induce maximal heart rate in recreational football players.
Which exercise test is most suitable to induce maximal heart rate in recreational football players?
RCT (n=66)
Randomly assigned to different tests on separate occasions
Which exercise test is most suitable to induce maximal heart rate in recreational football players?
Absolute Event Rate: 73% vs 17%
The Yo-Yo intermittent endurance level 1 test provides the most accurate estimation of maximal heart rate in recreational football players, with probability of achieving HRmax increasing when test duration exceeds 7.8 minutes.
May support Yo-Yo test for maximal heart rate estimation in athletes; hypothesis-generating, requires validation before practice change.
This study aimed at examining the suitability of a standard treadmill test (TT), popular intermittent field tests, and small‐sided football matches to induce maximal heart rate (HR max ) in recreational football players. Sixty‐six inactive untrained male subjects (age: 39.3 ± 5.8 years, VO 2max : 41.2 ± 6.2 mL kg −1 min −1 , body mass: 81.9 ± 10.8 kg, height: 173.2 ± 6.4 cm) were evaluated. On separate occasions, the players were randomly submitted to a progressive VO 2max TT, to the Yo‐Yo intermittent endurance level 1 (YYIE1) and level 2 (YYIE2) tests, to the Yo‐Yo intermittent recovery level 1 (YYIR1) test, and to 7v7 (43 × 27 m pitch, 83 m 2 /player) football matches (45 minutes; 2‐4 matches/player). To ensure data consistency, exercise HR was recorded using the same HR monitors in all the experimental conditions. A total of 73%, 24%, 18%, 17%, and 30% of the players achieved their HR max during the YYIE1, YYIE2, YYIR1, TT, and the small‐sided football matches, respectively. The probability of achieving HR max increased proportionally to test duration, with 7.8 minutes as the cutoff time. Variations in HR peak of ±2 b min −1 should be regarded as of practical relevance. YYIE1 HR peak provided the most accurate estimation of a subject's individual HR max and much higher probability of reaching HR max . Nevertheless, the results of this study suggest caution in considering a reference test for HR max assessment in this population. The use of confirmation tests is still highly advisable when the test duration is shorter than 7.8 minutes. In this regard, field tests seem to be suitable and accurate for individual HR max assessment in recreational football players.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Póvoas et al. (2019) conducted an RCT in Inactive untrained male subjects (recreational football players) (n=66). Yo-Yo intermittent endurance level 1 (YYIE1) test vs. Standard treadmill test (TT), YYIE2, YYIR1, and small-sided football matches was evaluated on Achievement of maximal heart rate (HRmax). The Yo-Yo intermittent endurance level 1 test induced maximal heart rate in 73% of players, compared to 17% for a standard treadmill test, providing the most accurate estimation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: