Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: Combinations of checkpoint inhibitors and tyrosine kinase inhibitors are contemporary standards of care in first-line treatment of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. Real-world evidence remains scarce. Patients and methods: We retrospectively investigated the tolerability and effectiveness of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab-approved based on the results of the CLEAR trial-under real-world conditions in 145 patients. Results: The median age was 63 years (range 21-87 years). The majority of patients were male (69%) and had a predominant clear-cell histology (88%). Adverse events (AEs) occurred in 94% of patients, with fatigue (50%), hypertension (39%) and diarrhea (38%) as most common AEs. Grade ≥3 AEs were seen in 59%. Interruption of at least one of the drugs due to toxicities was required in 68% of patients. The dose of lenvatinib was reduced in 56%. The objective response rate was 66%, with 8% of patients achieving a complete remission. Primary progression was seen in 8% of patients. At a median follow-up time of 12.2 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 10.3-15.5 months], 35% of patients experienced disease progression. Progression-free survival at 6 months was 76% (95% CI 71.9% to 79.7%). Twenty-one percent of patients died, most of them due to progressive disease. Limitations of our analysis are the short follow-up period and the retrospective nature of the analyses. Conclusions: Our cohort supports the use of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab in a real-world population, including CLEAR-ineligible patients. However, AEs should be closely monitored and treatment should be adapted accordingly.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stelmach et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: