Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This experimental investigation studied the potential of co-fired blended ash (CFBA), obtained from co-firing sawdust and coal, for the development of bricks and mortar. The identified new raw material CFBA underwent chemical (X-ray fluorescence spectrometry), physical (specific gravity determination, sieve analysis), mineralogical (X-ray diffraction) and morphological (scanning electron microscopy) characterisation. CFBA was used as a partial fine aggregate substitute in the production of bricks and as a supplementary cementitious material in mortar. The developed bricks were tested for compressive strength, water absorption and efflorescence. Bricks developed with 15% sand substitution by CFBA were found to be in accordance with the Indian standard (IS 1077) and were suggested for non-load-bearing walls. In contrast, in the case of mortars (10–30% CFBA content), decreases in compressive strength (25–63%) and flexural strength (3–9%) were observed in comparison with standard mortars. Hence, the study concluded that the use of CFBA as an alternative raw material for the production of bricks was feasible.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ram et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: