Key result
Fetuses with Tetralogy of Fallot and pulmonary stenosis had similar total great artery dimensions to matched controls, and the aorta-to-pulmonary artery ratio remained stable throughout gestation (r=0.08), suggesting an intrinsic developmental mechanism.
Why the study?
Aortic dilation in TOF is primarily attributed to increased in utero aortic flow, but whether it instead arises from abnormal neural crest cell migration with unequal septation remained to be evaluated.
Case-Control (n=200)
No
Aortic dilation in fetal Tetralogy of Fallot appears to be driven by an intrinsic developmental mechanism rather than increased flow, as the aorta grows proportionally throughout gestation with total great artery dimensions similar to controls.
Supports neural crest hypothesis for TOF aortic dilation; leaves open need for longitudinal confirmation.
Background Aortic dilation in tetralogy of Fallot (TOF) is primarily attributed to increased aortic flow in utero . An alternative hypothesis is abnormal neural crest cell migration, with unequal septation of the truncus arteriosus resulting in a larger aorta and inherently hypoplastic pulmonary artery (PA). If so, we hypothesize the aorta to PA ratio (Ao:PA) in TOF is stable throughout gestation, and the total sum of dimensions of the great arteries is similar to controls. Methods We performed a single-center retrospective study of all fetuses with TOF (2014-2020) and gestational age-matched controls. We compared sums of diameters, circumferences, and cross-sectional areas of the aorta and PA and evaluated the Ao:PA across gestation in TOF with pulmonary stenosis (TOF-PS) and atresia (TOF-PA). We analyzed data with two-tailed t-tests and Pearson’s correlation. Results There were 100 fetuses with TOF (36% TOF-PA) with median gestational age of 31 weeks [IQR 26.5, 34.4] and median maternal age of 34 years [IQR 30, 37]. There were no differences in sums of great artery dimensions between TOF-PS and controls. In TOF-PA, sums were significantly lower than controls. The Ao:PA was stable throughout gestation. Conclusions The aorta in fetal TOF is large but grows proportionally throughout gestation, with a sum of great artery dimensions similar to controls. TOF-PA appears to be distinct from TOF-PS (with overall smaller dimensions), and is a group that warrants further investigation. In conclusion, our findings do not support the flow-mediated model of aortic dilation in TOF, and instead suggest an intrinsic developmental mechanism. Clinical Perspective What’s New? The aorta in fetal Tetralogy of Fallot (TOF) is large, but grows proportionally throughout gestation with a total sum of great artery dimensions similar to controls. Fetuses with TOF with pulmonary atresia have smaller great artery dimensions than TOF with pulmonary stenosis; this distinct group warrants further investigation. Our findings suggest that aortic dilation in TOF may be secondary to an intrinsic developmental mechanism, rather than from increased flow to the aorta in utero . What are the clinical implications? The mechanisms of aortic dilation in fetal TOF have not been previously investigated. While aortic dilation is commonly seen in TOF, the degree of its progression over time and risk of dissection are not well understood. A better understanding of the etiology of aortic dilation in TOF could help to inform management decisions, particularly regarding the need for prophylactic surgical repair.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dasgupta et al. (2023) conducted a case-control in Tetralogy of Fallot (n=200). Tetralogy of Fallot vs. Normal intracardiac anatomy (matched controls) was evaluated on Sum of great artery dimensions (aorta and pulmonary artery) and aorta-to-pulmonary artery ratio across gestation. Fetuses with Tetralogy of Fallot and pulmonary stenosis had similar total great artery dimensions to matched controls, and the aorta-to-pulmonary artery ratio remained stable throughout gestation (r=0.08), suggesting an intrinsic developmental mechanism.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: