Why the study?
Does enoxaparin improve clinical outcomes compared to unfractionated heparin in high-risk patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome?
Does enoxaparin improve clinical outcomes compared to unfractionated heparin in high-risk patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome?
Odds Ratio: 0.91 (95% CI 0.83–0.99)
Absolute Event Rate: 10.1% vs 11%
Number Needed to Treat: 107
Enoxaparin is an effective alternative to UFH in the management of NSTE-ACS, but cross-over between anticoagulants should be avoided to minimize bleeding risks.
Supports preferring enoxaparin in NSTE-ACS; leaves open bleeding risks with crossover in contemporary practice.
Non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) refers to a cardiovascular disorder characterized by intracoronary thrombus formation on a disrupted atherosclerotic plaque with partial or transient occlusion. Generation of thrombin resulting from exposure of collagen leads to activation of platelets and conversion offibrinogen to fibrin, thus forming a platelet-rich thrombus. The main therapeutic objective is to protect the patient from thrombotic complications, independent of the choice of antithrombotic agents. The management of NSTE myocardial infarction (MI) is constantly evolving. For primarily conservative strategy, enoxaparin has been proven superior to unfractioned heparin (UFH). With early invasive strategy providing better clinical outcome compared with conservative strategy, the effectiveness of enoxaparin in reducing death and MI rates is now being reconsidered in the era of poly-pharmacotherapy, early percutaneous coronary interventions and drug eluting stents. Bleeding complications can be minimized by avoiding cross-over from UFH to enoxaparin or vice versa, or by reducing the dosage of enoxaparin. We review the studies of enoxaparin and discuss its current role in the contemporary treatment of NSTE-ACS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schmidt‐Lucke et al. (2007) conducted a review in Non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS). Enoxaparin vs. Unfractionated heparin (UFH) was evaluated on Death or non-fatal MI at 30 days (based on a meta-analysis of 6 trials) (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.83-0.99).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: