Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: The impact of body mass index (BMI) on outcomes following deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction remains debated. Although obesity is a well-known risk factor for surgical complications, limited evidence exists on the safety of the DIEP flap across different BMI populations. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of 117 patients (144 flaps) who underwent DIEP flap breast reconstruction between January 2018 and August 2024. Patients were stratified into 3 BMI groups according to the World Health Organization classification: normal weight, 18.5–25 kg/m 2 ; overweight, 25–29.9 kg/m 2 ; and obese, 30 kg/m 2 or higher. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data were collected. Results: Complication rates were generally low across BMI groups. Abdominal seroma ( P = 0.038) occurred significantly more often in patients with a BMI 30 kg/m 2 or higher. Fat necrosis and total flap loss occurred exclusively in the obese group, with rates of 7.1% in each, and both findings approached statistical significance ( P = 0.056). No significant differences were observed in rates of infection, wound dehiscence, hernia, or flap loss. Hospital stays increased with BMI; each unit increase in BMI was associated with a 0.20-day extension ( P = 0.006). BMI was not an independent predictor of postoperative donor-site, recipient-site, or flap complications. Conclusions: DIEP flap reconstruction is a safe option for class I and II obese patients. Although higher BMI is associated with increased rates of abdominal seroma and longer hospital stays, overall complication rates remain acceptable. BMI alone should not be considered a contraindication for autologous breast reconstruction in non–morbidly obese patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nava et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: