Key result
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance was feasible and safely performed without adverse effects in a patient with a temporary permanent external pacemaker system.
Why the study?
Access to MRI remains limited for patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices due to safety concerns, requiring careful risk-benefit assessment.
Is cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging safe and feasible in a patient with a temporary external pacemaker system?
Case Report (n=1)
Is cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging safe and feasible in a patient with a temporary external pacemaker system?
CMR can be safely performed in highly selected patients with a temporary permanent external pacemaker system to facilitate diagnosis.
Supports safe CMR feasibility in select S-ICD patients; leaves open need for prospective data before broader use.
BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is increasingly becoming the imaging modality of choice for many clinical disorders due to superior image quality and absence of radiation. However, access to MRI remains limited for most patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices due to potential safety concerns. In line with guidelines, there is no absolute contraindication to perform MRI, but warrants careful risk-benefit assessment. CASE SUMMARY: A 59-year-old man was admitted with a 5-day history of central chest pain and few week's history of general malaise, dry cough, and breathlessness. Electrocardiogram confirmed complete atrioventricular block (CAVB). A slight increase in cardiac enzyme was noted. Coronary angiogram revealed atheromatous changes, but no obstructive coronary lesion. A temporary transvenous pacemaker was inserted. Transthoracic echocardiogram confirmed a dilated left ventricle with severely reduced left ventricular function. To facilitate diagnosis (hence prognosis), management and mobilization, investigation with cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) was warranted but contraindicated by the temporary transvenous pacemaker. An active fixation pacemaker lead was therefore placed in the right ventricle via percutaneous puncture of the right subclavian vein and connected to a pulse generator, both secured to the skin with sutures and adhesive medical dressing. Appropriate device programming and close patient monitoring ensured that CMR could be performed without any adverse effects. A diagnosis of acute myocarditis was confirmed. Regular device interrogation during an extended 3-week period with temporary pacing ruled out any device failure. As there was no resolution of CAVB, the patient received a dual-chamber pacemaker. DISCUSSION: Cardiovascular magnetic resonance was feasible and safely performed on a patient with a temporary permanent external pacemaker system using a standard screw-in pacing lead and a regular pulse generator fixed to the skin. Although more studies are needed for generalizability, CMR may be used in highly selected patients with a temporary pacemaker.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chaudhry et al. (2019) conducted a case report in Complete atrioventricular block and suspected acute myocarditis (n=1). Cardiovascular magnetic resonance with a temporary permanent external pacemaker system was evaluated on Feasibility and safety of cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance was feasible and safely performed without adverse effects in a patient with a temporary permanent external pacemaker system.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: