Key result
Cardiovascular MR and MDCT imaging can noninvasively assess components of reperfusion injury, with MR transmural infarct and microvascular obstruction serving as predictors of post-infarct recovery.
Why the study?
How do cardiovascular MR and MDCT imaging perform in assessing reperfusion injury components and manifestations in ischemic heart disease?
How do cardiovascular MR and MDCT imaging perform in assessing reperfusion injury components and manifestations in ischemic heart disease?
Cardiac MR and MDCT are valuable noninvasive imaging modalities for evaluating the components and consequences of myocardial reperfusion injury.
MR and MDCT may support noninvasive reperfusion injury assessment; leaves open their role in post-MI risk stratification pending prospective validation.
Advances in magnetic resonance (MR) and computed tomography (CT) imaging have improved visualization of acute and scar infarct. Over the past decade, there have been and continues to be many significant technical advancements in cardiac MR and multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) technologies. The strength of MR imaging relies on a variety of pulse sequences and the ability to noninvasively provide information on myocardial structure, function and perfusion in a single imaging session. The recent technical developments may also allow CT technologies to rise to the forefront for evaluating clinical ischemic heart disease. Components of reperfusion injury including myocardial edema, hemorrhage, calcium deposition and microvascular obstruction (MO) have been demonstrated using MR and CT technologies. MR imaging can be used serially and noninvasively in assessing acute and chronic consequences of reperfusion injury because there is no radiation exposure or administration of radioactive materials. MDCT is better suited for assessing coronary artery stenosis and as an alternative technique for assessing viability in patients where MR imaging is contraindicated. Changes in left ventricular (LV) volumes and function measured on cine MR are directly related to infarct size measured on delayed contrast enhanced images. Recent MR studies found that transmural infarct, MO and peri-infarct zone are excellent predictors of poor post-infarct recovery and mortality. Recent MR studies provided ample evidence that growth factor genes and stem cells delivered locally have beneficial effects on myocardial viability, perfusion and function. The significance of deposited calcium in acute infarct detected on MDCT requires further studies. Cardiac MR and MDCT imaging have the potential for assessing reperfusion injury components and manifestations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maythem Saeed (2010) conducted a review in Ischemic heart disease and reperfusion injury. Cardiovascular MR and MDCT imaging was evaluated. Cardiovascular MR and MDCT imaging can noninvasively assess components of reperfusion injury, with MR transmural infarct and microvascular obstruction serving as predictors of post-infarct recovery.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: