Why the study?
Existing non-invasive tests for CAD are limited to either anatomical or functional assessments, prompting evaluation of the added diagnostic value of CT-FFR combining both characteristics.
Does adding CT-FFR improve the diagnostic accuracy for hemodynamically relevant CAD in patients with suspected stable angina compared to standard non-invasive tests?
Cross-Sectional (n=202)
Blinded interpretation of diagnostic and reference tests by a core lab
No
Does adding CT-FFR improve the diagnostic accuracy for hemodynamically relevant CAD in patients with suspected stable angina compared to standard non-invasive tests?
Absolute Event Rate: 0.93% vs 0.94%
p-value: p=0.40
Adding CT-FFR to the diagnostic workup of suspected CAD improves diagnostic accuracy beyond SPECT or CCTA alone and performs comparably to a combined SPECT and CCTA strategy.
Multiple non-invasive tests are performed to diagnose coronary artery disease (CAD), but all are limited to either anatomical or functional assessments. Computed tomography derived Fractional Flow Reserve (CT-FFR) based on patient-specific lumped parameter models is a new test combining both characteristics simulating invasive FFR. This study aims to evaluate the added value of CT-FFR over other non-invasive tests to diagnose CAD. Patients with clinical suspicion of angina pectoris between 2010 and 2011 were included in this cross-sectional study. All underwent stress electrocardiography (X-ECG), SPECT, CT coronary angiography (CCTA) and CT-FFR. Invasive coronary angiography (ICA) and FFR were used as reference standard. Five models mimicking the clinical workflow were fitted and the area under receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve was used for comparison. 44% of the patients included in the analysis had a FFR of ≤ 0.80. The basic model including pre-test-likelihood and X-ECG had an AUROC of 0.79. The SPECT-strategy had an AUROC of 0.90 (p = 0.008), CCTA-strategy of 0.88 (p < 0.001), 0.93 when adding CT-FFR (p = 0.40) compared to 0.94 when combining CCTA and SPECT. This study shows adding on-site CT-FFR based on patient-specific lumped parameter models leads to an increased AUROC compared to the basic model. It improves the diagnostic work-up beyond SPECT or CCTA and is non-inferior to the combined strategy of SPECT and CCTA in the diagnosis of hemodynamically relevant CAD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Peper et al. (2021) conducted a cross-sectional in Coronary artery disease (n=202). Computed tomography fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) vs. Combined strategy of SPECT and CCTA was evaluated on Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for diagnosing hemodynamically relevant CAD (95% CI 0.895-0.962, p=0.40).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: