Aims This study aims to assess the diagnostic performance of a novel computed tomography-derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) algorithm and to compare its accuracy at three predefined sites: (i) at the location of invasive FFR measurements (CT-FFRatloc), (ii) at selected sites determined by an automated module integrated within the algorithm (CT-FFRauto), and (iii) distally in the vessel (CT-FFRdistal). Methods and results We prospectively recruited 108 consecutive patients with stable symptoms of coronary artery disease and at least one suspected obstructive lesion on coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA). CT-FFR was validated against invasive FFR as gold standard using FFR ≤ 0.80 to define myocardial ischaemia. CT-FFRatloc showed good correlation with invasive FFR (r = 0.67) and improved the ability to detect myocardial ischaemia compared with CCTA at both lesion [area under the curve (AUC) 0.83 vs. 0.65, P < 0.001] and patient level (AUC 0.87 vs. 0.74, P = 0.007). CT-FFRauto demonstrated similar diagnostic accuracy to CT-FFRatloc and significantly improved specificity compared with CT-FFRdistal (86% vs. 49%, P < 0.001). High end CT quality improved the diagnostic performance of CT-FFRauto, demonstrating an AUC of 0.92; similarly, the performance was improved in patients with low-to-intermediate coronary artery calcium score with an AUC of 0.88. Conclusion Implementing an automated module to determine the site of CT-FFR evaluations was feasible, and CT-FFRauto demonstrated comparable diagnostic accuracy to CT-FFRatloc when assessed against invasive FFR. Both CT-FFRatloc and CT-FFRauto improved the diagnostic performance compared with CCTA and improved specificity compared with CT-FFRdistal. High end CT quality and low-to-intermediate calcium burden improved the diagnostic performance of our algorithm. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT03045601
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bråten et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: