Key result
Proximal culprit lesion localization in NSTEACS was associated with significantly higher peak NT-proBNP levels compared to distal lesions (mean 1055 ng/l vs 381 ng/l; P=0.01).
Why the study?
Do NT-proBNP serum levels reflect the severity and extent of ischemia (proximal vs distal culprit lesion) in patients with NSTEACS?
Observational (n=23)
Do NT-proBNP serum levels reflect the severity and extent of ischemia (proximal vs distal culprit lesion) in patients with NSTEACS?
High peak NT-proBNP levels in NSTEACS independently correlate with proximal culprit lesions and myocardial damage, reflecting the extent of jeopardized myocardium.
NT-proBNP elevation may signal greater ischemic extent in proximal NSTEACS; hypothesis-generating for noninvasive lesion severity assessment.
OBJECTIVE: To explore the relationship between NT-proBNP elevation and prognosis in patients with NSTEACS. BACKGROUND: High NT-proBNP levels are related to a worse prognosis in patients with ACS. The precise mechanism by which is not clear. METHODS: Serial sampling of NT-proBNP, Troponin T and CK-MB was performed in 23 patients admitted with NSTEACS. Using coronary angiography in each patient a culprit lesion was identified. Proximal lesions were located before or at the first major branch of the parent artery. All other lesions localizations were considered distal. To evaluate the influence of left ventricular systolic function on NT-proBNP levels WMSI was measured by echocardiography. RESULTS: Proximal culprit lesion localization was associated with significant higher baseline (mean 506 ng/l, SD 440 ng/l) and peak NT-proBNP levels (mean 1055 ng/l; SD 236 ng/l), as compared to patients with a distal lesion localization. (Baseline: 139 ng/l, SD 140 ng/l, peak: 381 ng/l; SD 64 ng/l). (P = 0.01) NT-proBNP levels were highly correlated to Troponin T and CK-MB peak serum levels. Adjustments for left ventricular dysfunction did not alter these associations. CONCLUSIONS: High peak NT-proBNP levels are independently associated with both proximal culprit localization and elevated biochemical markers of myocardial damage. These findings suggest that NT-proBNP levels reflect the amount of jeopardized myocardium and could signify the integral of the extent and severity of an ischemic event.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Riezebos et al. (2006) conducted an observational in Non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTEACS) (n=23). Proximal culprit lesion localization vs. Distal culprit lesion localization was evaluated on Peak NT-proBNP levels (ng/l) (p=0.01). Proximal culprit lesion localization in NSTEACS was associated with significantly higher peak NT-proBNP levels compared to distal lesions (mean 1055 ng/l vs 381 ng/l; P=0.01).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: