Why the study?
Does elevated NT-proBNP predict significant coronary artery disease in unstable angina patients with normal ECG, echocardiogram, and cardiac enzymes?
Does elevated NT-proBNP predict significant coronary artery disease in unstable angina patients with normal ECG, echocardiogram, and cardiac enzymes?
In patients with unstable angina and normal ECG, echocardiogram, and cardiac enzymes, an elevated NT-proBNP level (>200 pg/ml) is a strong independent predictor of significant coronary artery disease.
May support NT-proBNP testing in select unstable angina; leaves open prospective validation before clinical use.
BACKGROUND: Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) are not specific for ventricular dysfunction and other cardiac processes, such as myocardial ischemia, may also cause elevation of these markers. METHODS AND RESULTS: To determine whether elevation of NT-proBNP without elevation of cardiac specific markers can predict coronary artery disease (CAD), the serum level of NT-proBNP was measured in 161 patients with unstable angina (61.0+/-8.1 years, male 54.0%) with normal ventricular function (left ventricular ejection fraction >55% and no regional wall motion abnormality by echocardiography) and normal troponin I level (<0.05 ng/ml). In these patients, levels of C-reactive protein and myoglobin were normal and none had Q wave on electrocardiographic (ECG). The NT-proBNP level was higher in patients with CAD (n=74) than in patients without CAD (n=87) (173.1+/-231.6 vs 68.1+/-62.5 pg/ml, p<0.001). At the standard cut-off point of >200 pg/ml, elevated NT-proBNP level shows high probability of CAD (odds ratio, 10.1; 95% confidence interval, 2.6-38.7, p=0.001). The NT-proBNP level positively correlated with the extent of CAD (r=0.329, p=0.001). In multivariate analysis, the NT-proBNP was an independent predictor of CAD. CONCLUSION: These results suggested that NT-proBNP is a useful screening test for CAD in the unstable angina patients with normal ECG, echocardiogram and cardiac enzyme levels.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hong et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: